SELECT COMMITTEE ON FICTITIOUS in spring 1835 • 18 ' Will 43 - o " JJ " poor;' in summer 1835 " poor-" in summer 1836 " poor;" and in spring 1837 " poor VOTES, IRELAND. 59 in spring 1 836 " rateable ;" Mr. James Lane. parish t° " No 473, and state whether you at 10/ there ? D. Connell, Blarney- lane; he was valued in 1828 1105 Was he rated in the spring of 1829?— He was returned '' poor" i spring 1829 ; m summer 1829 " poor;" in spring and summer i8qo 16 February 1838 spring and summer " nnor- » T ,^ 31 " in spring 1832 " poor;- m summer 1832 . Poor' he continued " poor all through; in spring and summer 1833 " poor-" in spring and summer 1834 " poor;" in spring and summer 1835 " poor-" in spring 1836 he was returned " rateable;" in summer 1836 he was returned poor; m spring 1837 he was returned " rateable." 1106. Mr. Beamish.) Was it not about 1835 that Mr. Wherland was chiefly employed in revising the returns of the exemption?— Yes. • 1107. Mr. Serjeant Jackson."] Do you find this person's name on the printed register, No. 1030?— Denis Connell, woolcomber, Blarney- lane; a bouse in 131arney- lane; 10/. householder; registered the 27 th of November 1832. 1108. In the same parish wilf you turn to No. 662?— Edward Mulcahy, Fair- lane; valued in 1828 in two bouses, at 5/. each; they are both in Fair- lane, one next to the other. 1109. Do you find him rated in the spring of 1829?— In spring 1829 he was rated for one, and the other returned " waste;" in summer 1829 he was also rated for one, and the other returned " waste;" in spring 1830 the same; in summer 1830 he is rated for both; in spring 1831 he is returned " poor" for one, and " waste" the other; in summer 1831 " poor" for one, and " waste" for the other; in spring 1832 " poor" for each ; in summer 1832 he is rated for one, and returned " poor" for the other. 1110. Now turn to the registry, and look at No. 2907?— Edmund Mul- cahy, baker, Fair- lane, in the city of Cork; a house and yard at Fair- lane; 10/. householder ; registered the 22d of November 1832. 1111. Now will you turn back to the rate- books, and see how he stands for the spring of 1833?— In spring 1833 he is rated for one, and returned " poor" for the other; in summer 1833 he is returned " poor" for each; in spring 1834 he is returned " poor" for each; in summer 1834 lie is rated for one, and returned " poor" for the other; in spring 1835 he is rated for one, and returned " poor" for the other; in summer 1835 he is rated for one, and returned " waste" for the other in spring 1836, both the houses are returned " rateable;" also in summer 1836 and in spring 1837 they are returned " rateable." 1112. Now will you turn to St. Ann's Shandon, No. 1268?— James Murphy, in Clarence- street, valued at 7 I. in 1828. 1113. How was he dealt within the spring of 1829, as to rating?— In spring 1829 he was returned " poor," and in summer 1829, spring and summer 1830, and in spring and summer 1831 ; in spring 1832 he was returned " waste;" in summer 1832 he was returned " poor;" in spring 1833 he was returned " poor;" in summer 1833 " poor;" in spring 1834 " rateable;" in summer 1834 " poor;" in spring 1835 " rateable;" in summer 1835 " poor;" in spring 1836 he was re- turned " poor;" in summer 1836 " poor;" and in spring 1837 " poor." 1114. Will you refer to the register, and look to No. 2736, and see whether you find him there ?— James Murphy, grocer, Clarence- street; house and shop at Clarence- strect; a 10 I. householder; the 13th of November 1832. 1115. Now will you turn to St. Nicholas parish, and look to No. 36?— Walter Wall, in Barrack- street; valued at 61. in 1828. 1116. Was he rated in the spring of 1829?— No ; he is returned " poor m spring and summer 1829, in soring and summer 1830, in spring and summer 10 . . r - 1 1833 poor in in and summer >> in summer 1836 he is " rateable;" and in spring 1837 1117. Turn now to the printed register, No. 4190?- Walter Wall, shopkeeper, Barrack- street; a house at Barrack- street; 10/. householder; ist November 153*. 1118. In the same parish of St. Nicholas, turn to No. 74. Do you hnci person there named Jeremiah Sheehan, of Barrack- street ?- Yes ; he is valued at