Lane. for until the sprino- of 1835 in my office J Kept one OOOK, m » ' he returns of every assize's Since that I have kept the original book returned to me bv the parish constables, and given out copies to the col ectors. 1086. Can you ascertain who were the parish constables 111 1832?- I will endeavour to ascertain it before the next day. ,087. In the same parish will you turn to No. 268; do you find Timothy KeS?_ Win ' you read how he is described ?— Timothy Kenny, dwelling- house in Curtis's- iane, valued at 7/. in 1828. ^ 2089. Was that individual rated consequently 111 the spring ot 1829 r— irle was returned " poor" in spring 1829. ^ „ 1000. How was he returned in the summer of 1829:— Rateable. 1091. How was he in the spring of 1830 ?—" Poor," summer 1830 " poor," spring 1831 " poor," summer 1831 " poor;" spring 1832 " poor,'' and in summer 1832 " rateable." 1092. Will you now refer to the printed list of registered voters, and look at No. 2080^ and state whether you find his name there?— Timothy Kenny, stocking hosier, Curtis's- lane; house and shop at Curtis's- lane; 10/. householder; 17th of October 1832. 1093. How much had he been valued in the valuation of 1 828 ?—£. 7. 1094. Was he rated again in the spring of 1833 ?— He was not. In spring 1833 he was " poor," and in summer 1833 he was " poor;" in spring 1834 " poor," in summer 1834 " poor;'' in spring 1835 " poor," in summer 1835 " poor;" in spring 1836 he was returned " rateable," or rather another person in his house was returned " rateable," Alexander Keefe. In summer 1836 the house was returned " poor;" there is no name attached to it; in spring 1837 he was returned " poor;" he is returned " poor lodgers." io95- Will you turn to the parish of Christ Church, No. 350; in that parish do you find a person of the name of Cunningham?— Yes ; T. Cunningham, a dwelling- house, Tobin- street; he was valued at 61. in the year 1828. 1096. Was he rated in the year 1829 ?— No, he was returned " poor" in 1820, both spring and summer, and in 1830; in spring 1831 he was returned " poor/' in summer 1831 he was returned " rateable " in spring 1832 he was returned " poor;" in summer 1832 he was returned " rateable." 1097. Now turn to the printed register, and refer to No. 901 ?— Timothy Cunningham, hairdresser, Tobin- street; houses and shop in Tobin- street; 10/. householder; registered the 10th of November 1832. 1098. How does he stand in the spring of 1833?— In spring 18 3 > he was returned " poor," in summer 1833 " poor;" in spring 1834 " poor," in sum- mer 1834 poor; in spring 1835 " poor." 1099. You say that he is registered for houses ; in the valuation does he appear to be valued for more than one house ?- Only one; in summer 1835 he was poo?'^ m SPnng 1836 " P°° r'" iD SUmmCr 1836 " in spring 1100. Will you turn to St. Mary Shandon, No. 382 ?- Timothy Keily, Blarney- lane; he was valued in 1828 at 81. } } 1101 summer in sprin lane; a ,„, Leaseholder; 31 "'"" J" Poor ^ an° dVin° Iummerta? 833 ^ ^^ ah. a. ion- hooks 1533 P001' in spnng and summer 1834 " poor;" ley- lane; lie was valued in 1828 at 8/. J J' 01. Washe rated in 1829?- He was returned " poor" in 1820 spring and ler; and spring and summer 1830. In spring and sunnner 1 8^ " noo^- r. ng 1832 " poor," and in summer 1832 " rateable " 3 P '