IS MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN I5EFORE THE it is a very old house, in bad repair, one story high, and Mr. John Young, tlnnk it is worth more, it is a eiy a garret. registered?—" Bartholomew Cork; house in Wisdom's lane ; house- ^/^ r^ been worth 10 , a year in 183, ?- It ^ HS^ To Mr. Colburn.) When did the man vote?- In 1832, 1835, and 18 2146. ( To Mr. Lane.) Was that person valued in the supplementary valuation of 1833?— He was, and struck out on appeal. 2147. ( To Mr. Young.) Did you visit and value the house of Denis Buckley, of Wellington- road, since Christmas ?— I did. • n48 What do his concerns consist of?— They consist of a very poor small thatched cabin, behind which there is a back house, also thatched, both m very b; 1tTHas he any land ?— There is a very large field behind it, and on one side of it with which he told me he had nothing to do; he told me that the field and'the house did not belong to the same landlord, that he had only the house and what I saw. 2150. Was there any space intervening between the house and the back } 10USe ?— Merely a short space, you went under the air about four or five feet. 2151. What is the full value, in your opinion, of his house ?—£. 5. 21.52. ( To Mr. Colburn.) Do you find him in the register ?—" Denis Buckley, publican, Wellington- road, house and land at the Wellington- road; householder, 10 I.; registered 2d November 1835." He voted in 1837- 21.53. Mr. Beamish, to Mr. Young. You did not understand that he had any land ?— I was aware that he had registered out of a house and land, and I was curious to know whether he had any land; and I asked him, and he told me he had nothing to do with that field. 2154. Did he possess any land in that neighbourhood held under the same landlord ?— I do not know. 2155. You did not see his lease ?— No. 2156. You do not know whether he had land or not in his possession at the time he registered ?•— No. 21.57. But you saw the man himself, and you were aware that he had regis- tered out of a house and land, and you interrogated him with the particular view to ascertain whether he had any land?— I did. 21.58. Mr. Beamish.] Did he tell you that he had not any land ?— He did not; but he told me he had nothing to do with the land attached to the bouse. 21.59. But he did not tell you that he did not hold land under the same land- lord that he held the house from ?— No. 2160. Mr. Serjeant Jackson.'] But all the land that you saw was an interval of five or six feet between the house and the back house ?— Five or six feet. 2161. Enough to save a man's conscience, if he had a mind to swear that he had land ?— I do not think it would save my conscience. 2162. Mr. Beamish.] He did not tell you that he had no land ?— He did not. 2163. Mr. Serjeant Jackson, to Mr. Lane.] Do you find him upon the valu- ation ?— No. 1 2164. ( To Mr. Young.) Did you visit and value the house of Thomas Buckley, ot Rockwell- lane, since Christmas ?— I did. 5? at 7alue did J ™ set uPon his house per annum. 2160. What kind of house is it ?— It is a very good house of the kind. 215/ What description of house ?— A very good poor man's house, consist- ing of two rooms up stairs, which his wife told me were let at 10 d. a week each, iTMTVhe f? und fl0OT> which he lived in himself, manLKf ^" Y^ T the agister ?- « Thomas Buckley, watch- 1832." h° USe ^ ; householder, 10 7, that tenement have been worth 10 1 in 1832 ? o! 1°; J?' Was that Person ever valued ?— No. did, hi Did ^ PerS° n V° te at ^ ° f the elections ?- He 2172. To