Last Chance to Read
 
 
 
 
You are here:  Home    Fictitious Votes, Ireland

Third Report from the Select Committee on Fictitious Votes, Ireland

30/07/1838

Printer / Publisher:  
Volume Number:     Issue Number: 
No Pages: 1
 
 
Price for this document  
Third Report from the Select Committee on Fictitious Votes, Ireland
Per page: £1.00
Whole document: £1.00
Purchase Options
Sorry this document is currently unavailable for purchase.

Third Report from the Select Committee on Fictitious Votes, Ireland

Date of Article: 30/07/1838
Printer / Publisher:  
Address: 
Volume Number:     Issue Number: 
No Pages: 1
Sourced from Dealer? No
Additional information:

Full (unformatted) newspaper text

The following text is a digital copy of this issue in its entirety, but it may not be readable and does not contain any formatting. To view the original copy of this newspaper you can carry out some searches for text within it (to view snapshot images of the original edition) and you can then purchase a page or the whole document using the 'Purchase Options' box above.

188 MlNX JTES OF E V I D E N C E T A K E N B E F O R E T HE 22 May 1838. m r 710803. This refers to complaints made?— Yes, it does. Mr. . James Ternan. Then you do not mean to state that Mr. Fosberry, m his judgments with respect to the title and right of the voters, acted partially ?— I saw, in a good many instances, that Mr. Fosberry rejected claimants 011 the Liberal side who I conceived had a good interest, and who held a larger quantity of land than persons he admitted on the other side, much larger. 10895. And who had an absolute qualification ?— Yes, that was my impres- sion ; I might have been wrong. 10896. there is an appeal given to the going judge of assize ?— Yes. 10897. Were there appeals entered in those cases?— Yes, there were a good many appeals. 10898. Were those men admitted upon appeal ?— There were someone or two admitted, but the rest were not; the appeals were not tried, I think. I forget now the cause, but I know the assizes and sessions and all were going on at the same time, and the appeals came on to be tried before Judge Dogherty ; one or two were tried and the rest were not tried. 10899. The question refers to those cases in which you said that persons were rejected by Mr. Fosberry having a better qualification than others admitted upon the opposite side. Were there appeals as to those ?— I think there were appeals in a great many instances. 10900. Can you state as to those ?— No, I cannot as to those instances ; I did not attend in the court. 10901. You would know at the court of sessions whether the appeals were lodged ?— I am aware that appeals were lodged; there were appeals in most cases, on both sides, whenever a man was rejected. • 10902. There were appeals on both sides against Mr. Fosberry's decisions ?— In some few instances 011 the Conservative side, but in a great many instances on the side of the Liberal party. 10903. Do you know what became of the appeals on the Conservative side? — I do not think they were tried; I am not quite sure ; I think they went along with a large number that remained untried. 10904. Were any votes put on the registry on the Conservative side that you consider to be fictitious votes ?— At the time I considered that there were a good many whose qualification did not appear so good as those that were rejected on the Liberal side; I will not say that I considered them fictitious at the time. 10905. Can you give some instances on both sides, namely, of votes that were admitted on the Conservative side with a worse interest than those rejected upon the Liberal side ?— Not having any notes taken at the time, I could mention some; but I am not very certain, and therefore I will not state them. 10906. What is your notion of a fictitious vote?— I consider a fictitious vote where a man has not a qualification, and goes up to vote. 10907. An absolute want of qualification, or the not having a sufficient interest ?— Not having a sufficient interest in the lands out of which he registers. 10908. What do you conceive to be, under the Reform Act, an interest which entitles a man to vote ?— It is a matter that I did not study or pay much atten- tion to; I would not think myself competent to give an answer to that. _ 10909. Then you are not prepared to give an opinion ?— In general, I might give an opinion. 10910. What is your notion of the interest which entitles a party to vote under the Reform Act?— I think any holder of from 10 to 15 acres of land ou » ' lit to be a 10/. freeholder. 10911. Without reference to what he might be able to get for that land if he were to set it to another ?— Certainly not; there are different modes of exa- mination. 10912. What test would you apply to ascertain whether he had a competent interest witlim the meaning of the Reform Act ?— I would not take upon myself to apply any test; the general test, which was applied in 1832, was, whether he could get 10/. over and above all charges; that was the test that Mr. Fosberry applied; that a solvent tenant would pay him 10 l. over and above all charges ; lie did not admit what is called the beneficial interest. 10913. Did he apply that test uniformly on both sides ?— Indeed, I think he did as well as I recollect; generally speaking, they used to take it by the acre, and take it by the bulk. J 10914. In applying that test, how much the man could get from a good and solvent tenant, what opportunity had Mr. Fosberry of admitting upon the one side
Ask a Question

We would love to hear from you regarding any questions or suggestions you may have about the website.

To do so click the go button below to visit our contact page - thanks