23 8 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE TIIE yard at French's Quay, to L householder, registered 1st November 1832. I do not find him in the valuation ( ai, pembroke- lane; • J!: ,0th of November 1832. I do not fi^ fwho"- JoL Fitzgerald, Bishop's- street; a house at BishopWreet, I o'/ f householder, 1 2th November 1832. He is not to be found m the valuation valued in the supplementary 1 was struck out. ^ ?_ T] lomas Fleming, eating- house keeper, Blarney- hue a house at Blarney- lane, 10 /. householder, 13th November 1832 ; I can- ot find 1dm in the valuation. The next is Michael Fogherty, shoemaker, Wel- lington road ; a house at Wellington- road, a 10 I. householder 13th November 1832- he is not in the valuation. The next is James Franklin, coppersmith, Sullivan's Quay; a house and yard at Sullivan's Quay, 13th November 1832, a 10/ householder; I cannot find his name anywhere m the valuation. The next is Edmund Fitzmaurice, vintner, Mannix's- square; house at Mannix's- square, a 10/. householder, 17th November 1832; there is no such place men- tioned in the valuation books. The next is Michael Fitzgerald, carpenter, Barrack- street; a house at Barrack- street, 10 I. householder, 19th November 1832; he was valued in the supplementary valuation at 5 L, and he appealed and Avas struck out. 766. And he has accordingly enjoyed his exemption since ?— He has. 767. Who comes next?— John Fitzgerald, slater, Douglas- street; house at Douglas- street, 10/. householder, 23d November 1832; he was valued in the supplementary valuation at 6 /., and he appealed and was struck out. The next is John Foley, labourer, North Francis- street; house at North Francis- street, 10 /. householder, 26th November 1832; 1 do not find him in the valuation. The next is Cornelius Flynn, shoemaker, Dominick- street; house at Dominick- street, a 10/. householder, 29th November 1832; I do not find him in any of the valuations. 768. Mr. Bcamish.~\ Is it your opinion that the class of voters under the Reform Act are of a better nature than those under the former Acts ?— I am clearly of opinion that if the Reform Act is properly carried into force, the class of voters would be better. 7C9. The question is, whether the class of voters now under the Reform Bill, as they stand, are better upon the whole than the class of voters as they stood before ?— I would say, that they decidedly would be if the Reform Bill were carried into proper working. 770. Taking the working of the Reform Bill as it is, are the voters of a better class upon the whole ?— I would say that, upon the whole, they are of a class that are more entitled to have the franchise than those that were previous to the Reform Act. 77i- What is your opinion with regard to the liberty voters, or the rural voters; do you conceive them a good class?— I conceive that the liberty voters are, m a general way, a very good class, and very well entitled to have the wor - John Fahy, carpenter, Dominick street . . ' , 4i -, AT